enflasyonemeklilikötvdövizakpchpmhp
DOLAR
13,5079
EURO
15,4453
ALTIN
791,13
BIST
2.098,63
Adana Adıyaman Afyon Ağrı Aksaray Amasya Ankara Antalya Ardahan Artvin Aydın Balıkesir Bartın Batman Bayburt Bilecik Bingöl Bitlis Bolu Burdur Bursa Çanakkale Çankırı Çorum Denizli Diyarbakır Düzce Edirne Elazığ Erzincan Erzurum Eskişehir Gaziantep Giresun Gümüşhane Hakkari Hatay Iğdır Isparta İstanbul İzmir K.Maraş Karabük Karaman Kars Kastamonu Kayseri Kırıkkale Kırklareli Kırşehir Kilis Kocaeli Konya Kütahya Malatya Manisa Mardin Mersin Muğla Muş Nevşehir Niğde Ordu Osmaniye Rize Sakarya Samsun Siirt Sinop Sivas Şanlıurfa Şırnak Tekirdağ Tokat Trabzon Tunceli Uşak Van Yalova Yozgat Zonguldak
İstanbul
Az Bulutlu
6°C
İstanbul
6°C
Az Bulutlu
Salı Az Bulutlu
4°C
Çarşamba Parçalı Bulutlu
8°C
Perşembe Hafif Yağmurlu
10°C
Cuma Karla Karışık Yağmurlu
2°C


New development in Halkbank’s case in the USA

New development in Halkbank’s case in the USA
11.11.2021
0
A+
A-

Halkbank, which applied to the Second District Court of Appeal to appeal the decision of a lower court on the claim that it could not be tried in the USA before, and whose appeal was rejected, has made a new application to the court.

Halkbank, whose appeal to the higher court to end the trial in the USA was rejected, appealed again. The lawyers argued that the court board made “an extremely important legal mistake”.

The bank’s application to the appeal court on the grounds that it could not be tried in the United States under the “foreign state immunity law” was rejected.

According to the news of VOA Turkish’s Can Kamiloğlu, Halkbank requested a retrial and a new trial, and the court to review the previous rejection decision. Halkbank’s 27-page request for a retrial and a new hearing was made by the bank’s lawyers in the USA, Robert M. Cary, Simon Latcovich, Eden Schiffmann, James w. With Kirkpatrick’s signature, it was filed on November 5 via the Justice Department’s electronic filing system. Halkbank’s lawyers added the reasoned decision of the same court on October 22 to their petitions.

In Halkbank’s application, it was stated that for the first time in the history of the country, an institution under the scope of the “Independent Foreign State Immunity Law” was given the green light for the trial of an institution in the USA, and that the court made an extremely important legal mistake. The petition included the decisions taken in similar cases before.

Yorumlar

Henüz yorum yapılmamış. İlk yorumu yukarıdaki form aracılığıyla siz yapabilirsiniz.